Emily Dickinson’s preoccupation with death: Is it an obsession or piety?

Emily Dickinson is a very popular figure in the history of American literature. The study of American literature will remain incomplete without reading any poem written by her. This poet has a great contribution and large influence on poetry. She is considered one of America’s most famous poets. There is confusion about the number of poems she has written, but according to various sources, we come to know that she has written almost two thousand poems on various issues. Out of these poems, almost five hundred poems have been published. She was a very mysterious person throughout her life. If we read her poems then we can see her personal agony, frustration and obsession for death as the main themes of her poems. It seems that she was obsessed with death. 

Image Source

It is difficult to mention if Emily Dickinson’s preoccupation with death was her obsession or piety. It should be better to think that she seemed to be obsessed with death. For this reason, the concept of death has got the most importance in her poems. It should not be wrong if we say that theme of death has become a significant subject in her poems. She also talked about what might happen after death. It will be almost impossible to find a single poem where she did not talk about death. It does not mean that she was afraid of death. Rather, she accepted it for what it is. Everything has its end.

To get a clear idea about her obsession for death, readers will have to know the way she had led her life. Her way of leading life was different than other poets of her time. She led a very monotonous, unusual and isolated life. In her whole life, she remained completely alone, and she did not have many friends. She was very close to her sister-in-law. She used to communicate with other friends through letters. She had written one thousand letters. Because of her isolated life, she became detached from society. She also had a negative idea towards society and God because of her alienation. In her whole life, she did not go out of her village more than once.

She chose a very simple life and used to wear white clothes, and she had a great reluctance to greet guests. Later in her life, she even did not come out of her room. She had a complaint against the society that society did not give her recognition as a poet. As she was isolated and alienated from everything, the thought of death came to her mind as an obsession. Her separation and engrossment with death led to the development of her romantic attitude towards it.

Emily Dickinson became famous for her preoccupation with death. For this reason, most of her poems contain stanzas focusing on death, specifically her own death and her own afterlife. Her attitude towards death was astonishing. It is clear that there was no fear or horror in her mind about death as one can see in the poem titled ‘Because I could not stop for death’. She wavers between reality and illusion while commenting on her ideas about the afterlife. The first stanza states,

“Because I could not stop for Death –

He kindly stopped for me –

The Carriage held but just Ourselves –

And Immortality.”

In this stanza, the poet tells the readers that she and Death are passengers in a carriage. The reason for making this personification is to show the continuous use of the idea of death in Dickinson’s life.

The death of her parents as well as her friend, Charles Wadsworth, with whom she was supposed to get married, came as a great shock to her. It gave her the pain of losing loved ones. She writes,

“My life closed twice before its close;

It yet remains to see

If immortality unveil

A third event to me”

In these lines, we can see the poet’s experience of facing death. She says that she has encountered death twice before it finally comes to her. She then hints that those who die will go to heaven while those who are alive will continue to live in Hell. In this poem, her attitude of awareness toward death is revealed.

Her poem, ‘I felt a Funeral, in my Brain’, is the best example that shows her obsession for death. She says,

“I felt a funeral in my brain,

And mourners, to and fro,
Kept treading, treading, till it seemed
That sense was breaking through.”

Here, in this poem, we can see her thought about death. The poet said that she could feel the death psychologically. This poem shows that there is no hope of immortality. It only shows a miserable thrust into an eternal abyss. Its gloomy tone is found in describing the terrible struggle because of the separation of the body from the soul. But the physical death also seems to offer a momentary insight into the nature of infinity.

Due to her loneliness, Emily Dickinson became obsessed with death. Death came as an obsession to Emily Dickinson. Here, ‘funeral’ is used as a metaphor.

Another poem that shows her obsession for death and afterlife is ‘Safe in their Alabaster Chambers’. Some lines have been quoted below from this poem,

“Safe in their alabaster chambers –

Untouched by morning -

and untouched by noon –

Sleep the meek members of the resurrection,

Rafter of satin and roof of stone.”

In these lines, the poet is talking about the lives of dead people who are sleeping in their coffins. They are untouched by morning and noon. They will remain asleep until resurrection. Here, ‘alabaster’ is meant as coffin and ‘chamber’ as grave.

Many scholars and philosophers have given their own opinions about Emily Dickinson’s preoccupation with death. Thomas H. Johnson was Emily Dickinson’s editor and biographer. According to him, for the poet, death is a mystery to be explored, but he says that Dickinson remained undecided as to a solution throughout her work. Virginia H. Oliver’s Apocalypse of Green is the frame within which Dickinson tests her religion, faith and belief through the medium of her poetry. What Katharina Ernst said was that death was perhaps the most thorough-going discussion in the poetry of Emily Dickinson.

Not only Emily Dickinson but also many poets like Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton have an obsession for death. Their attitude towards death is revealed in their writings. At the beginning of this essay, a short biography of Emily Dickinson was given. She died after suffering for a long time. Sylvia Plath is another feminist writer. She got married to Ted Hughes and had a miserable married life. Because of her unhappy married life, she had a mental breakdown, which led her to an obsession for the theme of death in her poetry. When she was just thirty-one years old lady, she committed suicide. The same thing happened to Anne Sexton whose eighteen-year long career was abruptly ended because of her suicide. If readers read poems written by these poets, they will find one thing in common and that is the obsession for death. They dealt in their poems with seclusion, depression and obsession for death, and even suicide.

Each poet or writer has his or her own preoccupation or obsession for something. For example, William Wordsworth is well known for writing about nature and this created a new era in English literature. So, we can easily say that he was highly obsessed with nature. Ted Hughes wrote a lot about animals. He used animals as metaphors, and with the use of animals, he has shown the behavior of human beings. Similarly, Emily Dickinson was preoccupied with death.

So far, I have tried to prove that Emily Dickinson’s preoccupation with death was her obsession not piety. To prove her obsession for death, I have mentioned some of her poems and did a little bit of discussion. She has expressed her thoughts about death with the use of nature, religion and love. In the end, it can be said that her preoccupation with death was an obsession, and it can be found in her poems.

Difference between William Wordsworth and T.S. Eliot

Both Wordsworth and T.S. Eliot are major figures in English literature. Wordsworth was the pioneer of the Romantic age while T.S. Eliot was an earlier poet of the modernist tradition. Eliot has great contributions in the field of literary criticism. Eliot was a fan of classicism. Wordsworth, on the other, was a fan of romanticism. This difference of opinion between the two poets also created a difference between their works. Wordsworth died a long time ago, even before T.S Eliot started writing. There is a gap of about one hundred years between the two poets. So, there was no chance for Wordsworth to counter the criticism of T.S. Eliot. 

Regarding classicism, Eliot believed that Classicism is an integral part of literature, and one should take the best concepts of classical literature and create new literary products. Hence, he was in support of following major poets like Shakespeare and Milton. He thought that it was not possible for someone to create something new without following these poets. On the contrary, Wordsworth was against classicism.

According to Wordsworth, the literature did not talk about ordinary people or nature. Even literature does not have the language of ordinary men. Instead of supporting classicism, Wordsworth started a new movement called Romanticism. Romanticism not only focused on nature but also the use of imagination. Wordsworth gave a lot of emphasis on the use of imagination, but T. S. Eliot was against it. He said that having an imagination is not a bad thing but too much use of imagination degrades poetry. He wanted to follow the classical poets. One should read the works of the classical poets and follow their style. So, we see a difference of opinion between the two poets. With the use of logic, T.S Eliot showed why people should shun Wordsworth’s ideals. He tried to say, directly and indirectly, that one cannot produce good literature following the ideals of Wordsworth. If someone wants to become a poet, he or she should study the classical poets and understand their styles and then create his own poetry.

However, Wordsworth said that one does not need to know what the other poets did or did not. One should first go close to nature and then gain experience and create literature from the emotions that emerge in his heart due to that experience. Here, we do not see any connection with classical literature, but Eliot was all about Classicism. So, Wordsworth did not focus much on historical events or matters in his poetry. He did not use Roman or Greek mythology in his work. We do not even see any influence of famous poets like Shakespeare and Milton in his work. 

The Creative Faculty of Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Poets’ work is to write poems. They express their own feelings through poems and, at the same time, provide enjoyment to the people with their poems. Besides entertaining, poets also teach people ‘to think’, and on many occasions, they play the role of a teacher too. However, most of the poets do not talk a lot about poems or writing poems. William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge are an exception in this respect. Together they started the ‘Romantic Movement’ in English literature. So, it is expected that they would express their own thoughts and ideologies about poets and poems. Despite having similarities in their opinions about the Romantic Movement, there are many dissimilarities too. Though Wordsworth is credited as the central figure of the Romantic Movement, Coleridge’s contribution is no less. The main spirit of the Romantic Movement was to take the poem to nature and people.

Image Source

So naturally, the matter of nature would come first when we will discuss the ‘Creative Faculty of a Poet’. After reading Coleridge’s ‘Dejection: An Ode’ poem, readers may feel that the poet does not deny the importance of nature that much; rather wind and nature helped him to imagine. The poet expressed his imagination upon seeing windy air, wind and sky. So, it can be said that nature motivated and helped him to imagine. However, it is also true that the poet is in distress and so, the beauty of nature cannot inspire him totally to write a poem. Nature is beautiful, but as there is frustration and distress in his mind, the poet cannot enjoy that nature to the fullest.

This frustration and beauty have taken then life vigor out of the poet. When the poet was young, he had physical strength as well as mental happiness. However, now as he is living in distress, there is more frustration than happiness in him.

Coleridge reveals his own condition and says he cannot write a poem. It means he can no longer write a good new poem and cannot even complete the old ones. Because of this, there grew a poetic paralysis in him, and he is living with poetic paralysis. Nothing can be more saddening than this for a poet. If we look into the life of the poet, we could see that the poet’s mind, at that time, was stricken with frustration because he was not successful in his career. He had earned some fame as a poet, but he was not that famous at the time. Secondly, he was in a conflict with his close friend Wordsworth. Thirdly, he had never been successful in love and affection in his life. Above all, his time was not going well, and poverty was there as his constant companion as usual. Because of all these, there grew a kind of feeling of paralysis in him.

The basic theory of Wordsworth is that nature has an immense contribution to the flourishing of poetic feeling, and nature is very close to the poetic self. According to Coleridge, soul and individual creativity are much more important. Individual creativity and poetic intuition are even more important than nature. Poet’s poem could become more beautiful with individual creativity and enough practice. Coleridge’s opinion is exactly the opposite of Wordsworth’s from this point of view as well.

The creative faculty of a poet introduces him or her with a new horizon. A poet is a human being, just like another human being. But, with his creativity, he could present ordinary, but beautiful things to the people extraordinarily. Imaginary power is the main weapon for a poet. They can see something that others cannot.

With the help of imagination, a poet can rise above the thoughts of general people. He or she can go beyond human limitations and can make the poems invaluable to the people with his or her eternal touch. So, to Wordsworth, a poet is an important person to society and his or her creative faculty could only bring good to society.

To understand the ‘Dejection: An Ode’ poem, one must have very good knowledge about the background of Coleridge’s life. He could not become that successful in life and had to struggle against poverty until his death. Today, we know Coleridge as one of the immortal poets of English literature. However, he was not treated as an important person by many people during his lifetime. So, he could never enjoy the touch of success in his career, and likewise, fame or popularity was never bestowed in his fate. Still, after going through the ‘Dejection: An Ode’ poem, we can realize that Coleridge is one of the most important and biggest personalities in English literature.

Victorian poetry are the poems of experience

Victorian era has a great significance in the history of England. It is named after Queen Victoria who ruled the English throne for almost 64 years (1837-1901). During her reign, there was a peaceful atmosphere for a long time, which resulted in political and economic prosperity in Great Britain. At that time, science developed a lot and literature advanced to a great extent. Though it was a time for novel, it saw the rise of some famous poets like Alfred, Lord Tennyson and Robert Browning. It should be mentioned here that Robert Browning was one of the most notable poets of the Victorian age. 

Image Source

Robert Browning is a very famous poet of the Victorian age. He got a huge reputation for his mastery of dramatic verse, especially dramatic monologue. It made him one of the notable poets of the Victorian age. At the beginning of his career, he became recognized as the husband of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, one of the most prominent female poets of the Victorian era. However, Robert Browning had to struggle a lot to establish himself. In his poems, we can see that he has taken characters from real-life experiences. In that sense, we can say that Victorian poetry, especially Browning’s poetry, is the poems of experience. As an example, we can mention the names of “Fra Lippo Lippi” and “Andrea del Sarto”.

“Fra Lippo Lippi” is one of the best poems written by the Victorian poet Robert Browning. It is obviously one of the widely-read poems written in that period. It is written in dramatic monologue.

“Fra Lippo Lippi” was first published in a collection of poems titled Men and Women in 1855. It is thought that Browning was inspired to write this poem after visiting Florence. The main character of this poem has been taken from the 15th century real-life painter Filippo Lippi who was a real Florentine monk. He was one of the renowned artists of his time. The poet came to know about him when he had spent some time in Italy. Browning got the description of Fra Lippo Lippi’s life from Giorgio Vasari’s book Lives of Seventy of the Most Eminent Painters, Sculptors and Architects.

If we look at the history then we can see that Fra Lippo Lippi was the son of a butcher. In 1412, he was born in Florence. When he was two years old, he became an orphan. After that, his aunt adopted him. However, when he was at the age of eight, he was sent to a community of monks. In 1452, when he was forty years old, he became a chaplain of a convent in Florence, and in 1457, he was appointed Rector of St. Quirico at Legais. He gained prosperity at this time but died poor in 1469. It is heard that he spent his money on numerous love affairs.

In this poem, we can see almost the same thing of this renowned artist. However, the poet has brought some changes in the poem and appealed to the intellect of the mind of the audience. Here, he is shown as a painter-monk. The main theme of this poem is to show the influence of the church on art. With this poem, the poet also criticizes church law and the canon. It also questions celibacy.

As it is written in a dramatic monologue, the speaker is of course Fra Lippo Lippi and the silent listeners are watchmen who have caught him prowling at night. As he has been patronized by Cosimo de Medici, he has little to fear from the guards. He proceeds on to share his difficult monastic life history with them.

He said that he remained confined to the magnificent house of Medici for three weeks, but he had escaped from there on that night on hearing some girls’ passing by. After spending a good time, he was returning home, but the watchmen caught him. He said that whatever he did was disgraceful for them, but he became a monk against his own will. He said,

“thought I;

 By no means! Brief, they made a monk of me;

 I did renounce the world, its pride and greed,

 Palace, farm, villa, shop, and banking-house,

 Trash, such as these poor devils of Medici

 Have given their hearts to—all at eight years old.

 Well, sir, I found in time, you may be sure,

 ‘Twas not for nothing — the good bellyful,

 The warm serge and the rope that goes all round,

 And day-long blessed idleness beside!”

When he was a small child, he became an orphan. At the age of eight, his aunt took him to a monastery to prevent him from being starved to death. As a result, a good sense of observation developed in him from an early age. It later helped him to become an accomplished painter.

He failed to prove his skill in mastering the Latin language, which is a quality required of a monk. His talent and skill as a painter earned him a place and security of living in the monastery. His realistic pictures were praised by the monks but failed to get approval from the prior and other superior monks. They said Fra Lippo Lippi not to think about legs and arms but to focus on portraying the soul. He showed his disagreement with this view. He says, 

“A fine way to paint soul, by painting body

 So ill, the eye can’t stop there, must go further

 And can’t fare worse!”

According to him, physical beauty could easily combine with spirituality. He feels that all things, having been created by God, should be appreciated. He also said that one should discover the soul within oneself in the process of expressing gratitude to God.

He is totally against the view of using art for prophecy. Art should be based on direct experience because, in this way, an artist can portray the good world that God has created for us.

The poem that comes after that is “Andrea del Sarto” published in the volume of poems by Robert Browning, Men and Women. This poem talks about the Renaissance painter Andrea del Sarto. Like Fra Lippo Lippi, Andrea del Sarto also lived and worked in Florence. Because of his technical perfection, he was highly acclaimed by his contemporary painters like Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Raphael.

It is thought that whatever Fra Lippo Lippi started he carried it to the highest level. The whole poem talks about the craftsmanship of Andrea del Sarto and his frustration and marital relationship with Lucrezia. He was famous as a faultless painter. He could draw a picture in a perfect way. He says, 

“I am bold to say

 I can do with my pencil what I know,

 What I see, what at bottom of my heart I wish for.”

Despite having such perfection, his paintings were lifeless. He had the absence of ambition and that divine fire of inspiration, which made the works of his more famous contemporaries lively. This is thought to be the main problem of del Sarto's work. These two lines given below are the best example of how an art should look like. It also shows the lacking of del Sarto in his art. The poet says,

“Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp,

 Or what’s a Heaven for?”

It should be mentioned here that del Sarto is the speaker and his wife is the only listener of this poem. He spoke to his wife that he was appointed by the King of France, Francis, but he left France for Italy under the constant influence of his wife Lucrezia.

We can find del Sarto as a hypocrite. We can see him taking money from Francis with a promise of purchasing Italian artworks for the court. However, he did not return to France and spent all of the money on a house for himself and his wife in Italy. This poem finds Andrea in the house with the stolen money.

We can see him expressing grief for his worldly concerns that have kept him from fulfilling his promise as an artist. Technically his paintings were perfect, but they lacked the soul. He also said that though he succeeded technically where his contemporaries could not, their work eventually triumphs for its emotional and spiritual power.

In del Sarto’s character, we can see him too much possessive. He wants to control his wife. Even we can see that he condemns his wife for his failure as an artist. He was not active and vocally attacked his wife for not inspiring him. He wants to dominate his wife.

In conclusion, I would like to say that without experience, literature could not be much lively and visual. Readers lose their interest if they cannot find anything realistic or taken from the experience. Robert Browning has mixed his experience with imagination successfully.

Byron as a Romantic Neo-classicist poet

George Gordon Lord Byron was one of the major poets of the Romantic era. The Romantic period is considered to be the best period of English literature. At this age, Byron is considered a poet as equally talented as Keats, Shelley and Wordsworth. However, Byron was against romanticism though he was a romantic poet. In his poems, we see features of the romantic period and Neo-classical period as well. 

Image Source

Don Juan is one of the famous works of Byron. Byron himself considered it as an “Epic Satire”. This poem is considered anti-romantic for there are very few instances of romantic ideals. One of the major romantic features of this poem is the effective use of Byron’s imagination. The poem contains a beautiful description of nature and ordinary people. These are some of the few notable features of Romanticism in Don Juan. Canto I of Don Juan contains some features of Romanticism. Byron also talked about the necessity of individual freedom and the freedom of women.

It is true that Canto I contains many instances of the Neo-classical age and anti-romantic sentiments. At the end of Canto I, Byron severely criticized his contemporary poets. He criticized Wordsworth and Coleridge. Both Wordsworth and Coleridge were the most important poets of the romantic era and were considered pioneers of the Romantic movement. Wordsworth’s “Preface to Lyrical Ballads” is considered to be the starting point of the Romantic movement. Coleridge also had major contributions in making the Romantic movement popular in English literature. However, Byron believed that both Wordsworth and Coleridge were not so successful as poets. He was a follower of Dryden, Milton and Pope. Dryden, Milton and Pope belonged to the Neo-Classical age. They wrote about people. The first thing that we would notice about Don Juan is that it mainly focuses on urban life. All the characters of this poem were city dwellers, and their problems were very similar to the problems of people living in cities at that time. The problems were related to love and morality. In the Romantic age, Wordsworth and Coleridge focused on morality in their poems, but Byron represented reality and often used wits. Don Juan is a satirical poem and neither Wordsworth nor Coleridge could write such satirical poems. On the contrary, Pope and Dryden were famous for their satires and wits. In this regard, there are many similarities between Byron and Pope and Dryden.

There are some descriptions of nature in Don Juan, but the poem mainly focuses on humans. Here, nature is inorganic. It has no life or power. On the other hand, in the poems of Wordsworth and Coleridge, nature is very much alive. Byron also used imagination in a different manner compared to Wordsworth and Coleridge. In the poems of Wordsworth and Coleridge, imagination played a critical role. However, in Canto I of Don Juan, Byron used his imagination, but he tried to portray the real world as much as possible.

Though Byron is considered anti-classical, through Don Juan, he attempted to go beyond Neo-Classical and Romantic ideals. He composed such a poem that is very unique in English literature. Don Juan made him one of the most important poets of English literature. It is considered a masterpiece where we see that Byron tried to create a new kind of poetry that had not been written before. Even after Don Juan, we have not seen any poetry that can be considered equal to Don Juan.

Two major female characters received major attention in Canto I of Don Juan. One of them is Donna Inez, Don Juan’s mother. The other female character is Donna Julia, Don Juan’s lover. Through these two female characters, Byron started a new era in English literature. Before this, females or ordinary people did not receive much importance in poems. Women were either presented as queens or lady love. However, the individualism of Donna Julia and Donna Inez was never seen before in English literature.

Hypocrisy in Don Juan

There is no doubt that Don Juan is the best literary work of Lord Byron. Though it appears like a romantic poem, the readers would be able to understand that Byron is making fun of society and its hypocrisy. The background of Don Juan was set in Spain. The hero of the poem ‘Don Juan’ belongs to an elite class. However, the society depicted in the poem was very common to that of England. Through wit and humor, Byron exposed the hypocrisy of the English high society. 

Image Source

First, we have to know what is hypocrisy. Hypocrisy means when people believe something but do not act according to his belief. For example, if a person always says that one must speak the truth, but he himself lies all the time. Such hypocrisy is not only seen in individual life but in society as well. In a society, there are many rules and regulations and they are glorified saying that these rules are formed for the greater good of the people who live in that society. However, people do not follow these rules all the time. Often, they act against these rules and regulations. Thus, hypocrisy is a shameful act. When it becomes harder to follow any rules for people then hypocrisy becomes a tendency. In the case of Don Juan, we can see that the same thing has happened. In the society of Don Juan, different rules are ascribed, but people do not follow these rules. They say that these rules and regulations are good for them but in reality, they act totally opposite.

Byron mainly tried to show the hypocrisy related to morality. In Don Juan’s society, we can see that everyone values morality highly, but they are not moral. It means that they talk much about moral values like truthfulness, honesty and fidelity, but when it comes to tell the truth or remain faithful, they do the opposite. Don Juan’s mother, Donna Inez, tried a lot to teach Don Juan about morality, but she herself did not believe in morality. Byron tried to show that morality means not only utter some good words but also following them in your own life.

Byron also shows hypocrisy in love and marriage. First of all, Don Juan’s parents never loved each other. As a result, they never led a happy married life. Don Juan was not much happy in his personal life as well. After his father’s death, he was under the strict rules of his mother. So, the consequence was not good. There is no doubt that family is very important. Byron tried to say that too much strictness in a family never brings any good for us.

There was strictness in education. Donna Inez knows different languages, but she cannot speak her mother tongue, Spanish. In front of people, she tried to show that Hebrew and English are common languages. It means that she did not give importance to her mother tongue and did not have any respect for it. On the other hand, we can see that she was too much strict with Don Juan, and from his syllabus, she removed all those subjects, which related to love and affair. As a result, Don Juan was more attracted by these facts. Donna Julia’s company became more attractive for him.

Lord Byron talked about hypocrisy again and again in Don Juan because he wanted to convey the message that if there is too much strictness in a society then it would become a barrier to personal development. There was too much strictness in love, affair and education in the society of Don Juan and as a result, people became hypocritic. Byron not only revealed hypocrisy but also tried to find out the reason for hypocrisy. Maybe we can agree with him or maybe not, but it is true that if there is too much strictness in a society then maybe people would say something, but in reality, they would do the opposite. If they cannot do it openly then they would do many things secretly. In Don Juan, we can see the same picture in everyone. Maybe they speak openly about good things, but secretly they are not doing any good works.

Through Don Juan, Byron criticized his contemporary poets. He mainly criticized Wordsworth and Coleridge. He did not say that they are hypocrites, but he did not say anything good about the followers of Wordsworth’s ideals. In his personal life, Byron faced a lot of problems with society. Many people of his contemporaries did not like him, and he was compelled to leave his own country. In Don Juan, he showed the hypocrisy of his society and tried to take revenge through this poem.

‘Widsith’ as an entertainer or far traveler

‘Widsith’ is an Old English poem with great historical value compared to literary value. It is one of the major Old English poems. Without it, any discussion on the history of English literature will remain incomplete. In this poem, the poet mainly talked about his experience, some of which were real while the others were imaginary. He also mentioned some historical events, but it cannot be said with certainty that he was present at the time of those events for they happened through several centuries. Moreover, it is not possible for a man to travel all the places in a lifetime mentioned in the poem. Yet, this poem has great historical value. For this reason, it is very important to discuss this poem. 

Image Source

Here it needs to be mentioned that the entire manuscript of the poem could not be found. Only some parts had been recovered. Still, it is a very important poem. In this poem, the poet portrayed himself as a traveler who is traveling all the time. He traveled many places. Throughout the poem, he, directly and indirectly, said that due to his extensive traveling, he learned many things and gained a lot of knowledge. He also learned many new poems in the course of his travel. Traveling was a part of the poet’s life and he loved to travel.

The poem talks about several important historical events. For instance, the Hans defeated the Ermenrichs in battle in the 50^th century. In this manner, the poet described various events one after another. In fact, these events are part of history. Hence, this poem has great historical value.

Along with historical events, the poet also talked about people of different countries and in some cases, described their society. At present, we talk about “Social History” that focuses on the description of the lives of ordinary people aside from those of the kings and queens. ‘Widsith’ serves as one of the oldest examples of such social history. It is true that in ancient history, kings and queens had great significance, and ‘Widsith’ also talks about Kings and their battles- which king defeated who? Which king was murdered? However, the poet did not ignore ordinary people. Descriptions of the people of different nations came up in the poem.

Most probably, the poet who composed this poem created it while traveling on the road and entertained people by reciting it. Such instances were not rare in ancient times. Many people begged on the streets and recited poems or sang songs to entertain the passersby. Reading the poem, it would become evident to the reader that it was a well-composed poem and the sole purpose of the poet was to provide entertainment through this poem to the people. All of us love to hear stories. The historical events mentioned in the poem had been presented in the manner of telling a story to the people. The poet presented many serious historical events in a pleasant manner. Hence, the poet of ‘Widsith’ is not just a poet but also a historian and an entertainer as well.

The historical significance of ‘Widsith’ would never decrease. In this poem, the poet presented himself as a far traveler, Victorian, entertainer and most importantly a poet with great talent. It is unfortunate that only parts of the poem had been recovered. I think that if the entire poem could have been recovered it would help us to gain further insight into ancient history.